[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
.Q: Best Practice for dir owneership
- From: Jochen Schmitt <Jochen herr-schmitt de>
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: .Q: Best Practice for dir owneership
- Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:58:30 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
hello,
I have a special problem with a package which I have submitted
for review at BZ #174021. This package contains two subpackages
with fonts. the first subpackage conatins trutype fonts which
should installed at %{_datadir}/fonts/apl/TrueType. The second
conains classic X11 bitmap fonts which shluld installed on
%{_datadir}/fonts/apl/pcf. In comment #28 there was a suggestion
to put the X11 fonts to %{_datadir}/X11/fonts/apl but I think
only the core fonts on the X11 system should put into
%{_datadir}/X11/fonts, so I want to keep the X11 fonts into
%{_datadir}/fonts/apl/pcf.
Now there is the direcotry %{_datadir]/fonts/apl which is not
owned by any package.
My question now, what is the best practice to solve this problem.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.2 (Build 2424)
iQA/AwUBRN+Sfk9gByurcX4MEQIEkgCg/5C/I0WTGhucCKPCNkf/1niEaOMAn0Mp
OVnm30D0peWaz6mj+0UhwitT
=egsy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]