[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rpms/xl2tpd/devel xl2tpd.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- From: Paul Wouters <paul xelerance com>
- To: Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka ioa s u-tokyo ac jp>
- Cc: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: rpms/xl2tpd/devel xl2tpd.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 06:00:40 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> > > Author: pwouters
> > > Added Files:
> > > xl2tpd.spec
> >
> > Humm... perhaps I am not doing too well with my bugzilla handling
> > tonight, but I don't see off hand a review of this package or a
> > approval of said review.
> > What was the bug number of the review?
> > kevin
>
> I cannot see the corresponding review request from the bugzilla entry
> related to Paul Wouters (total 13).
>
> Unfortunately he has already rebuilt this against FE-devel,
> this package should be removed from FE-devel releasing queue.
See: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-November/msg00542.html
Since no one replied in over a week, I asked Tom Callaway, my sponsor,
how to proceed. He told me to go ahead with the migration.
So today I added xl2tpd, and will request branches for FC-6 and FC-5. Once
those are build, I will mark l2tpd as a dead package.
Paul
- References:
- Re: rpms/xl2tpd/devel xl2tpd.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Re: rpms/xl2tpd/devel xl2tpd.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]