Re: VTK license OK? (was: VTK anyone?)

[Patrice Dumas <pertusus free fr>]

On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 05:01:01PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> > 
> >  * Modified source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be
> >    misrepresented as being the original software.

I don't know exactly what it means but if it is about putting in source
code files that the source was changed it is also in the GPL:

a)  You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.

I think it is also about changing the name of the software, so I guess it
is not GPL compatible. Still it is free, as said in another mail.

--
Pat