[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora Extras RPMs should have Vendor and Packager?



Mike McGrath wrote:
Name        : NetworkManager-vpnc          Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version     : 0.5.0                             Vendor: (none)
Release     : 1                             Build Date: Sun 29 Jan
2006 10:22:36 PM EST
Install Date: Tue 31 Jan 2006 02:16:55 PM EST      Build Host:
hammer1.fedora.redhat.com
Group       : System Environment/Base       Source RPM:
NetworkManager-vpnc-0.5.0-1.src.rpm
Size        : 124687                           License: GPL
Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Mon 30 Jan 2006 09:51:57 PM EST, Key ID
82ed95041ac70ce6
Summary     : NetworkManager VPN integration for vpnc
Description :
This package contains software for integrating the vpnc VPN software
with NetworkManager and the GNOME desktop


At present its policy not to include these tags:

http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#tags

    -Mike


Why can't mock use "%vendor Fedora Extras" and "%package fedora-extras fedoraproject org" (or whatever generic email) in its rpmmacros file to define these fields?

Michael


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]