Re: Fedora Extras RPMs should have Vendor and Packager?

[Michael J Knox <michael knox net nz>]

Mike McGrath wrote:
> > Name        : NetworkManager-vpnc          Relocations: (not relocatable)
> > Version     : 0.5.0                             Vendor: (none)
> > Release     : 1                             Build Date: Sun 29 Jan
> > 2006 10:22:36 PM EST
> > Install Date: Tue 31 Jan 2006 02:16:55 PM EST      Build Host:
> > hammer1.fedora.redhat.com
> > Group       : System Environment/Base       Source RPM:
> > NetworkManager-vpnc-0.5.0-1.src.rpm
> > Size        : 124687                           License: GPL
> > Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Mon 30 Jan 2006 09:51:57 PM EST, Key ID
> > 82ed95041ac70ce6
> > Summary     : NetworkManager VPN integration for vpnc
> > Description :
> > This package contains software for integrating the vpnc VPN software
> > with NetworkManager and the GNOME desktop
>
> At present its policy not to include these tags:
>
> http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#tags
>
>     -Mike

Why can't mock use "%vendor Fedora Extras" and "%package 
fedora-extras fedoraproject org" (or whatever generic email) in its 
rpmmacros file to define these fields?

Michael