[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora Extras RPMs should have Vendor and Packager?



On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 16:51 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> You're not wrong, but currently mock and plague don't have the ability
> to define Packager dynamically. Fortunately Vendor is a lot easier and
> should require only a small change in the mock configuration files in
> order to set it to "Fedora Extras".
> 
We don't necessarily need to set Packager to be the maintainer of the
package.  It could be more akin to the tags on Core Packages:

Packager: Red Hat, Inc. <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla>

So, something like:
  %packager Fedora Extras <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla>

should be okay.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]