[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 179276] Request for kernel-module-ntfs inclusion in fedora extras
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 179276] Request for kernel-module-ntfs inclusion in fedora extras
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 07:24:50 -0500
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Request for kernel-module-ntfs inclusion in fedora extras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179276
------- Additional Comments From alexl users sourceforge net 2006-02-02 07:24 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> In reply to Comment #1 I was hoping that instead of an outright "no this wont
> work" people would be willing to re-visit the possibility of the inclusion of
> ntfs support.
For what it's worth, I agree, I would prefer to see ntfs in Extras, for
convenience. However bugzilla entry is probably not the best place to have a
discussion in general (even though this is posted to the fedora-extras-list)
unless it specifically about packaging related methods.
http://producingoss.com/html-chunk/bug-tracker.html#bug-tracker-mailing-list-interaction
I would leave open this bug post your spec file/SRPM, open up a new thread on
fedora-extras-list discussing reconsidering ntfs support in Extras and post a
link back here to the bug pointing out the Package Review submission.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]