Re: Povray, fedora extras and licensing

[Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>]

Greg DeKoenigsberg (gdk redhat com) said: 
> > BTW: Debian has povray-3.5 in "stable", but classifies it as "non-free".
> 
> Yep.
> 
> >From the reactions I've heard so far, sounds like a big "no" to me -- and
> it brings up a good question: is it reasonable to consider a similar
> "non-free"  repo for things like this that are (a) explicitly
> redistributable, but (b)  not free?
> 
> Not sure how I stand on that.

Hm, well, I could see something like that being useful, for, say, firmware.

Bill