Re: Povray, fedora extras and licensing

[Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>]

Patrice Dumas (pertusus free fr) said: 
> > it brings up a good question: is it reasonable to consider a similar
> > "non-free"  repo for things like this that are (a) explicitly
> > redistributable, but (b)  not free?
> 
> There are things like that on livna.

Well, yes, but it might be useful to separate the things that are
redistributable-everywhere-but-don't-meet-the-explicit-criteria
vs. other things.

Bill