[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:22:12 -0500
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181068
link pobox com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |link pobox com
------- Additional Comments From link pobox com 2006-02-13 13:22 EST -------
The package in general looks good to me.
I'd suggest either dropping the actual text of the specification entirely or
simply include it as %doc. Having a separate sub-package for this seems
essentially overkill.
Alternately I'd package up the spec and have the DTDs tag along (as they're a
normative part of the HTML 4.01 Recommendation).
The .ent(ity) files might beneficially be shipped by sgml-common -- since
they're common for HTML 2.0, 3.2, 4.0, and 4.01 -- and shared by the relevant
packages (cf. the comment at the top of the spec file).
For the %description I might use something along the lines of: [[[
Provides the three HTML 4.01 DTDs (strict, frameset, and transitional).
The DTDs are required for processing HTML 4.01 document instances using
SGML tools such as OpenSP, OpenJade, or SGMLSpm.
]]]
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]