Re: packaging suggestions.

[seth vidal <skvidal linux duke edu>]

> Looking at this old patched version. I had to make some changes to Bro
> that I sent upstream, and could not use the %configure but had to add
> some entries to make it do what it should and not what it wanted.
> 
> If the /svr/bro tree is allowed in extras.. that would clean up most
> of the problems. Bro is a server/service. If it isnt.. expect to do a
> bunch of cleanup. I think that most of my patch doesnt work with the
> later versions due to offsets and such.
> 

just for clarity - the fhs approved path is /srv/ - not /svr/

-sv