Re: packaging suggestions.

["Stephen J. Smoogen" <smooge gmail com>]

On 2/14/06, seth vidal <skvidal linux duke edu> wrote:
> > Looking at this old patched version. I had to make some changes to Bro
> > that I sent upstream, and could not use the %configure but had to add
> > some entries to make it do what it should and not what it wanted.
> >
> > If the /svr/bro tree is allowed in extras.. that would clean up most
> > of the problems. Bro is a server/service. If it isnt.. expect to do a
> > bunch of cleanup. I think that most of my patch doesnt work with the
> > later versions due to offsets and such.
> >
>

Talked to Seth on IRC, and /srv is also not the correct place for it
either from the FHS.. The bro package is going to need a lot of little
patches to match the FHS I think.



--
Stephen J Smoogen.
CSIRT/Linux System Administrator