[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:56:53 -0500
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monodoc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900
katzj redhat com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |katzj redhat com
------- Additional Comments From katzj redhat com 2006-02-15 17:56 EST -------
Note that the mono packages in Core have everything in %{_libdir} with nothing
in /usr/lib without problems. So what exactly is the problem with /usr/lib?
It's not clear to me at all from your comments on the wiki, you just say "you
have to do it this way"
And note that mono on x86_64 is broken with kernels between test2 and something
like 1939
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]