[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Packaging review guidelines clarification

Hi folks,

I'm reviewing a package that builds on FC4 but not on devel due to
recent GCC issues.  According to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines :

  "MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into 
   binary rpms on at least one supported architecture."

but, unfortunately, this says nothing about *which* version(s) of FC
should be used.  I think "one supported architecture on either
FC-current or FC-devel" would be appropriate but thats just my opinion.
And I could appreciate the reasoning behind "must build on FC-devel"
since its where all FE packages are initially imported.  So would
someone (Spot?) please clarify?


Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office:  MIT Dept. of EAPS;  Rm 54-1424;  77 Massachusetts Ave.
             Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails:  eh3 mit edu                ed eh3 com
URLs:    http://web.mit.edu/eh3/    http://eh3.com/
phone:   617-253-0098
fax:     617-253-4464

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]