[Bug 172755] Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Feb 16 05:15:05 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172755
------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-02-16 00:14 EST -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> ok, I did some searching around. It appears the license is really a SGI/STL
> license ( something like: http://www.mcda.org/help/stl.html ).
>
> From what I could gather this is a very close variant of the MIT license,
> so it should be ok to ship.
>
> Note that rpmlint only has "MIT" as a valid license, not MIT/X11.
>
> I would say change the License to just MIT and then it's APPROVED.
I disagree. IMHO, I don't think we should be changing license tags just to
silence rpmlint warnings. If rpmlint warns about it then make a note of it in
the spec file, file a bug with rpmlint, and live with the warning.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list