[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Package with no "upstream" source - clamav-exim



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:34:59 -0700, you wrote:

>I'm reviewing clamav-exim 
>(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181450)
>
>This is essentially some wrapper scripts and configuration files for 
>setting up a clamav daemon for exim.  So:
>
>- Do we need an COPYING file with the GPL license?  Or are all the 
>provided Source files assumed to be GPL?
>
>- Is a package with no upstream source acceptable?  (I would think so, 
>but...)

- From my point of view you should include a COPYING file with the
verbatin GPL to clarify the license terms of the files which are
dstribute with your package.

I you case you are the packager and the upstream author in the
same person.

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.2 (Build 2424)

iQA/AwUBQ/SRvk9gByurcX4MEQIFTgCg3akN0KP1WE52dsG6whhTmqOn3y4AoJuU
zpjsITWMpTCuglUeuBFMnyYX
=s7L4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]