[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 173719] Review Request: openmpi - a new MPI implementation
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 173719] Review Request: openmpi - a new MPI implementation
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:35:23 -0500
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: openmpi - a new MPI implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173719
------- Additional Comments From ed eh3 com 2006-02-16 14:35 EST -------
Hi Jason, I think most of comment #21 is fine but I have one objection:
*** PLEASE *** move the lam-supplied files [I'll refrain from using the
word "crap" here :-)] currently in /usr/include/* to /usr/include/lam/*
and from /usr/lib/* to /usr/lib/lam/*. Its something we really ought to
do. In fact, if lam were submitted to Fedora Extras in its current shape
it would not pass review for exactly these reasons.
And yes, the above lam changes would require some *small* changes to the
packages that depend upon it. Not a big deal. Whatever small pain it
causes now, the benefits for end users and Extras packagers dwarf it.
[And whoever decided it was a good idea to put files named "freq.h",
"boot.h", "net.h", and "args.h" in /usr/include should be banished to
rotating backup tapes in a cold machine room for the next month or two.]
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]