[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: static libs ... again
- From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <icon fedoraproject org>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: static libs ... again
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:04:44 -0500
Quentin Spencer wrote:
So, not too long ago someone asked why I still had static libs in one of
my packages since they are "banned" or at least strongly discouraged, so
I started removing them from my packages. All of the libraries I
maintain are math libraries, so security concerns are a non-issue. After
removing the static libs from fftw-devel, it took less than 24 hours to
get a bug report asking for them back. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181897 for the
reasoning.
It seems theirs is a rather specific and unique case. Should we change
policy to accommodate corner cases like that?
Regards,
--
Konstantin Ryabitsev
McGill University WSG
Mal: "Can I come in?"
Inara: "No."
Mal: "See, that's why I usually don't ask."
--Episode #6, "Our Mrs Reynolds"
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]