[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: static libs ... again
- From: Patrice Dumas <pertusus free fr>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: static libs ... again
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:34:44 +0100
> A USER never has any requirements for static libs.
As I said in another thread, there is a demand for static libs, especially
math stuff, to have portable binaries, in time and accross linux
distributions. It is really handy to be able to compile a model statically
and then put the executable on any computer to run it. And it may also
be nice to be able to rerun a model some time after, without a need to
recompile. I don't have discussed about that subject with a lot of people
but in the team I work with we like to compile statically math and plotting
stuff.
I have absolutely no idea about the number of people interested by static
libs, but I don't see any reason to avoid them when there is no security
issue, as it allows to build portable binaries.
--
Pat
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]