[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: static libs ... again



On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 00:06 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> It is not the use I do, nor advocate ;-). As I said above it is to 
> achieve portability of the executable.

I really don't buy this argument. If you're really wanting to move a
binary from one system to another, you can just as easily move the
libraries it depends on as well. Use LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I did this on
several occasions years ago, to run a binary compiled on Red Hat on a
Debian system.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]