[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 181994] Review Request: doulos-fonts - Doulos SIL fonts
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 181994] Review Request: doulos-fonts - Doulos SIL fonts
- Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:05:57 -0500
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: doulos-fonts - Doulos SIL fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181994
tibbs math uh edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs math uh edu 2006-02-18 15:05 EST -------
There's essentially no difference between this package and charis-fonts (bug
#181993), so here's a boring cut and paste.
rpmlint says:
W: doulos-fonts invalid-license SIL Open Font License
W: doulos-fonts wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/doulos-fonts-4.0.14/DoulosSIL4FontDocumentation.pdf
The license is acceptable; it's probably worth opening a bug against rpmlint to
get it added. The second warning is just rpmlint being dumb; there's no point
in paying attention to line endings in a PDF file.
Anyway:
rpmlint output is fine.
The package meets the naming and packaging guidelines.
The specfile is properly named and follows rather exactly that of a previously
accepted package.
The source file matches upstream.
The license is appropriate and included as %doc.
Approved.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]