Blend Fedora Objectives (was Re: Again: EOL Policy for Fedora Extras)
Thorsten Leemhuis
fedora at leemhuis.info
Sun Feb 19 08:08:10 UTC 2006
Am Sonntag, den 19.02.2006, 02:42 -0500 schrieb Warren Togami:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >
> > And then we have the same problem that Fedora Legacy currently has taken
> > to Fedora Extras (Legacy) -- it works, but it has a bad (or "not the
> > best") reputation because it sucked in the beginning.
> >
> > Do we want that? I would prefer a EOL call over a badly working Fedora
> > Extras Legacy.
> >
>
> I don't agree here. We should at least give the community a chance to
> maintain the collection, and EOL or retirement only happens if the
> community fails on a particular distribution. I have a feeling that FE3
> will continue to have users long after FE4 for various reasons for example.
I fully agree that we should give the community a chance to maintain the
collection. But earlier in this thread I got the impression "start a
fedora extras legacy even if it is foreseeable that it will suck and
fail" -- I don't like that idea to much.
CU
thl
--
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info>
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list