Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc

[Hans de Goede <j w r degoede hhs nl>]

Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > So, exploits opened by 'dietlibc' can be excluded for 'ipvsd'.
>
> I am convinced by your audit of the code, I still think that there could
> be security issues in dietlibc linked with ipsvd (in the places you 
> mentionned), but I personally agree that in that case the possible 
> efficiency gains overpass the possible security issues. But I believe
> that your explanation was needed too convince the reviewers (I hope that
> you'll be successfull ;-).

I for one am still far from convinced what exactly are those effiecency 
gains, numbers please. We've seen the data on the symbol list now lets 
see the data on the efficiency gain.

Regards,

Hans