Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc

[Hans de Goede <j w r degoede hhs nl>]

Enrico Scholz wrote:
> mitr volny cz (Miloslav Trmac) writes:
> > If ipsvd dynamically links to glibc, the ipsvd maintainer doesn't
> > have to watch for dietlibc changes;
>
> ipvsd is designed for 'dietlibc' (malloc() and friends are the only
> higher level functions, the other imported functions are pure syscall
> wrappers). So would not need to take care about dietlibc changes
> neither.

Please stop claiming this, using dietlibc is your idea, ipvsd upstream 
does not advice let alone propagandizes this.

Regards,

Hans