Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc

[Enrico Scholz <enrico scholz informatik tu-chemnitz de>]

j w r degoede hhs nl (Hans de Goede) writes:

>>> If ipsvd dynamically links to glibc, the ipsvd maintainer doesn't
>>> have to watch for dietlibc changes;
>> ipvsd is designed for 'dietlibc' (malloc() and friends are the only
>> higher level functions, the other imported functions are pure syscall
>> wrappers). So would not need to take care about dietlibc changes
>> neither.
>
> Please stop claiming this, using dietlibc is your idea, ipvsd upstream
> does not advice

upstream mentions 'dietlibc' several times and praises low memory
consumption. I would interpret this as 'advice'...



Enrico

PS: numbers will follow soon...