[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc



j w r degoede hhs nl (Hans de Goede) writes:

>>> If ipsvd dynamically links to glibc, the ipsvd maintainer doesn't
>>> have to watch for dietlibc changes;
>> ipvsd is designed for 'dietlibc' (malloc() and friends are the only
>> higher level functions, the other imported functions are pure syscall
>> wrappers). So would not need to take care about dietlibc changes
>> neither.
>
> Please stop claiming this, using dietlibc is your idea, ipvsd upstream
> does not advice

upstream mentions 'dietlibc' several times and praises low memory
consumption. I would interpret this as 'advice'...



Enrico

PS: numbers will follow soon...


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]