[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[Bug 177818] Review Request: adplug



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: adplug


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177818





------- Additional Comments From bugs michael gmx net  2006-02-24 13:46 EST -------
It's a matter of design. As /usr/share may be read-only, nobody could
create or modify the database file. Only the superuser of the master
server could. If the goal is to make it possible to distribute a shared
database file master copy to multiple machines in a network, /usr/share
would be right. Which solution to choose depends on where the global
database file comes from and how it is accessed at run-time. If it will
turn out to be something which is downloaded or updated at run-time,
/usr/share won't work on the individual machines. If it is something
which can be wrapped up in the RPM package as a default database, too,
/usr/share would work. Particularly, since users can override the db
contents from within their home dir.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]