Frustrated package submitters?
Hans de Goede
j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Sun Feb 26 08:25:55 UTC 2006
Patrice Dumas wrote:
>> - '''MUST''': For each binary and noarch RPM generated, reviewers
>> must verify that the list of provides ("rpm -q --provides ...")
>> are acceptable for this package.
>
> That would have avoided the issue, I believe. And it is good practice, so
> let's enforce it. It raises the cost of doing a review, but I believe it
> is worth it.
>
I'm not so sure, the longer the MUST list, the less thorough each step
will be done. We need to strike a balance here. This would make a fine
should though.
Regards,
Hans
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list