[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras)
- From: Michael Schwendt <bugs michael gmx net>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras)
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 21:22:24 +0100
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:22:26 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Okay, let's look at the whole situation from a different perspective.
> The following list shows maintainers that still have to rebuild more
> than 5 packages:
> 5 nos_AT_utelsystems.com
Nils has not signed up since the transition from fedora.us to Fedora
Extras.
> bugs.michael_AT_gmx.net abicheck 1.2-9
This is a noarch package in disguise, a Perl script. Its build-time tests
have given mixed results on different archs several times before. Hence I
prefer building it platform-dependent.
> bugs.michael_AT_gmx.net aide 0.10-2
>
Due to upstream changes in libmhash I've delayed updates here as long as
possible. Trouble with flex on x86_64 (bug #183098) still needs further
investigation.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]