[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Spiffy


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183028





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 freenet de  2006-02-27 09:59 EST -------
(In reply to comment #14)
> Mid-air collission - I'm replying to Ralf here.
> 
> Consider the case of adding another package implementing "webserver". 
Yes, ... RH's responsibility, bad design on their part.

However, there is a substantial difference between "webserver" and "perl(mixin)"

"webserver" is a virtual package/property, perl(mixin) is a 1:1 correspondence
to mixin.pm. 

> So we
> have two packages providing the same thing.  The "mixin" functionality you get
> depends on which package you 'use'.
Exactly.

>  You could never use that package and this
> one in the same Perl program because they would conflict at the language level.
>  What perl packages provide and which conflict with each other doesn't simply
> map onto RPM dependencies.
It does. perl(xxx) is the file dependency on xxx.pm with the %vendor*/%perl*
cruft removed.
 
> BTW, please quote the place in the review policy where the process of vetoing
> reviews is laid out.  I would like to know how it works, but I can't find it.
FE doesn't have a policy of vetoing.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]