Re: The Ruby license

[Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk redhat com>]

Looks to me like the sensible thing to do is to modify rpmlint.

--g

-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

> I couldn't find any of the valid licenses in rpmlint which matches the
> Ruby license.  These days everything in Ruby is dual Ruby/GPL; it it
> acceptable to use just GPL or should "Ruby license" be added to
> rpmlint's list?  (If so, I'll file a bug.)
> 
> Note that the OSI doesn't list Ruby's license, but Debian accepts it
> as free: http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/
> 
> The license text is at http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt
> 
>  - J<
> 
> -- 
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
>