On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 15:50 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > So, once more, what is > the overwhelming reason for preferring a competing C library over the > core > OS's C library? End users may want to build small static binaries to put on rescue disks and whatnot. dietlibc is useful to end users. But just because its packaged in extras, doesn't mean other packages should be using it. dietlibc should stay in IMHO, but perhaps an explicit policy should be made that such packages are there for end user use only, and MUST not be used by other FE packages.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part