[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc

From: Callum Lerwick <seg haxxed com>
To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
Subject: Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:42:57 -0600

> Your reply is out of context, unfortunately. I didn't ask why dietlibc
> exists.

This thread is such a giant mess I wasn't sure where to put it. ;P

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

References:
- Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc
  - From: Jochen Schmitt
- Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc
  - From: Patrice Dumas
- Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc
  - From: Enrico Scholz
- Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc
  - From: Patrice Dumas
- Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc
  - From: Enrico Scholz
- Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc
  - From: Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc
  - From: Enrico Scholz
- Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc
  - From: Michael Schwendt
- Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc
  - From: Callum Lerwick
- Re: Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc
  - From: Michael Schwendt

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]