[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[Bug 180897] Review Request: heartbeat



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: heartbeat


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180897





------- Additional Comments From paul city-fan org  2006-02-28 17:37 EST -------
(In reply to comment #35)
> remaining rpmlint issues:
> 
> W: heartbeat unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/cl_status
> - I do not know how to fix. Is this warning safe to ignore?

Why isn't it stripped? What permissions does it get installed with?

> W: heartbeat dangling-symlink /etc/ha.d/resource.d/ldirectord /usr/sbin/ldirectord
> The symbolic link points nowhere.
> - I do not know how to fix. Is this warning safe to ignore?

This symlink is explicitly created in the spec file:

(
  cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/ha.d/resource.d
  ln -s /usr/sbin/ldirectord ldirectord
)

Is it pointing from the right place to the right place?

> W: heartbeat dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel
> - I do not know how to fix. Is this warning safe to ignore?

Don't delete user or group accounts on package deletion, leave them there.

> W: heartbeat-ldirectord devel-file-in-non-devel-package
> /usr/sbin/supervise-ldirectord-config
> A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel
> package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to
> create a development package.
> - I think this is an error on the part of rpmlint. I can not 
>   see any reason this file would be flagged as a 
>   'development file', while it isn't.

It's probably the "-config" suffix of the name (without looking at the rpmlint
code). Looks bogus to me too.

> E: heartbeat-ldirectord incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/ldirectord
> Your logrotate file should be named /etc/logrotate.d/<package name>.
> - Agree with the error, but changing /etc/logrotate.d/ldirectord 
>   to /etc/logrotate.d/heartbeat-ldirectord would mean changing a 
>   lot of non-trivial things in source package. Can we safely ignore 
>   this?

Why wouldn't it just be a "mv"?

Having said that, heartbeat-ldirectord is a bit of a mouthful.

> W: heartbeat-ldirectord incoherent-init-script-name ldirectord
> The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case.
> - same as above. Can we safely ignore this?

I'd say so, yes.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]