[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: New tracker bugs for the use of ExcludeArchs in packages
- From: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 freenet de>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: New tracker bugs for the use of ExcludeArchs in packages
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:51:50 +0100
On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 13:29 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 29.01.2006, 13:32 +0100 schrieb Hans de Goede:
> > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > What if the ExclusiveArch is not a bug but a feature, for example say a
> > userspace support tools for certain hardware only found on certain
> > archs? Then there is no problem to fix, should one then still file bugs?
>
> In the past I would have said "no" but a lot of other packagers
> disagreed and convinced me -- so the answer is a "yes" from me now.
Please explain, I fail to understand the rationale.
> Other people simply might not know that the package is "for certain
> hardware only found on certain archs".
It already is: Inside of the spec. All you do is adding administration
overhead.
Ralf
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]