opengroupware for FE

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Wed Jul 5 11:00:40 UTC 2006


On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 12:53:03PM +0200, Erwin Rol wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 12:23 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 01:04:05AM +0200, Helge Hess wrote:
> > > On Jul 4, 2006, at 14:43, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > >That's how it is done now already. gnustep-make, libFoundation are
> > > >non-issues. libobjc-lf2 is a hack, but in this light still packaged
> > > >decently, but getting rid of it would be a blessing.
> > > 
> > > We have released libFoundation 1.1.0 which removes the hack
> > 
> > So gnustep-make can safely use -lobjc instead of -lobjc-lf2 as a
> > default?
> > 
> > > and adds a preliminary x86_64 port (seems to work fine but is not
> > > well tested ...):
> > > 
> > >   http://svn.opengroupware.org/ThirdParty/releases/libFoundation-1.1.0/
> > > 
> > > We'll work on packaging it (including RPMs and tarballs) ASAP but  
> > > maybe you want to look into this as well for your Fedora package.
> > 
> > I'd prefer using a released tarball otherwise it will make the review
> > process much harder (the reviewer is supposed to check the sources).
> > 
> > Even if it sounds silly, can you please just officially upload the
> > tarball to a permanent URL? Thanks!
> 
> So after this is done it means gnustep-make and libFoundation packages
> can be added to FE ? Axel will you "arrange" that ? 

Already started earlier today, but I'm waiting till the end of week to
make a call for reviewers (where Helge will have released some more
bits :).

See for example:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649

I'll repost with a list of all opengroupware related bugzillas when
they are submitted.

> The next step would be sope, Helge is there any magic going on in sope,
> or is that just a matter of packaging the latest release tarball. Like
> Axel mentioned working from a non tarball makes things a bit hard (local
> testing would work of course).

It's just packaging it up and I hope the current specfile will still
be able to do it. I recently packaged sope 4.5.7 and apart from an ICE
in objc in fc4 it went fine.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060705/4064cf57/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list