release tags during review
Wart
wart at kobold.org
Thu Jul 13 22:26:09 UTC 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>>"w" == wart <wart at kobold.org> writes:
>
>
> w> Is it allowed to use 0.n release tags during a package review, only
> w> to change it to '1' once the package has been approved and
> w> imported?
>
> It is commonly done by a couple of people. It violates the naming
> guidelines, and if I didn't trust the packager I would want to see a
> package that meets the naming guidelines before approving.
>
> I wouldn't really recommend it. Is there some reason why the package
> imported into extras has to start with release 1?
No particular reason, other than I have a handful of packages ready for
review that are already using 0.n. It might make it a little easier to
distinguish changes made during the review from change made after the
review in the changelog entries, but that's not very important.
- --Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEtsh/DeYlPfs40g8RAhKFAJ9WnM6jwNg4nTY5pJS1QbUHrVLRAQCcCzJV
prSADgz8fAN+aMP2voBNisY=
=lNKE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list