Question about WTFPL

Paul W. Frields stickster at gmail.com
Sun Jul 23 13:04:40 UTC 2006


On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 08:56 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
> seth vidal wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 00:43 +0200, Michał Bentkowski wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >> User Ian Chapman on
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 placed a
> >> review request to package with WTFPL license. And my question is
> >> simple: is it permissible in Extras?
> >> More information about it is here: http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/
> > 
> > 
> > I've forwarded this to the fedora legal contact.
> > 
> 
> Why? Licenses don't get much free-er then this, I thought we only needed
> to contact legal if we had questions about a license?

Because the legal department needs a good chuckle every now and
again. ;-)

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
       Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
    Fedora Docs Project:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060723/e51ab2f5/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list