libtar users headsup

[Michael Schwendt]

On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:51:36 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> As some of you may have noticed from my CVS commits, I'm taking over a
> bunch of packages from Anvil, because Anvil has other priorities then FE
>  ATM.
> 
> One of these packages is libtar. Before taking over I've done a quick QA
> check of all the packages which involved amongst other stuff running
> rpmlint. rpmlint on libtar gave some spurious messages because libtar
> normally only build a static (.a) lib.
> 
> The buildsys has just completed building a new libtar for devel which
> contains a proper .so file, with soname, 100% PIC etc. So I would like
> to ask all maintainers who maintain a package which uses libtar to build
> and then test it against the new libtar in devel.

There are zero packages in FE which BR libtar or libtar-devel