[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: aMSN and BWidget
- From: Wart <wart kobold org>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: aMSN and BWidget
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:43:14 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sander Hoentjen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the maintainer of aMSN in Extras, and there is currently a bug in
> the FE version of aMSN.
Do you have a bugzilla #?
This bug occurs because upstream aMSN uses it's
> own modified version of BWidget. Most of the changes are minor so that
> is why it was decided to use the already packaged bwidget version for FE
> amsn. It turns out however that one of the changes is really needed. I
> reported this change to upstream and I hope they will incorporate it but
> i haven't had a reply yet (only 2 days since i reported, so it can still
> come).
> In the meantime the bug is still there, and there are a few possible
> fixes:
> 1) I put the modified bwidget in the amsn package and use that
Ick. Please no.
> 2) I modify amsn so it can work with the bwidget that is in extras (it
> will result in a bit reduced functionality (not being able to choose
> chat font color anymore)
Doesn't amsn already work around these private bwidget changes? I seem
to recall that amsn redefines some of the bwidget procs after bwidgets
has been loaded. Can a similar thing be done here?
> 3) a small patch is applied to bwidget (which is 100% backwards
> compatible, it only adds an optional option)
As the FE maintainer of bwidget, I'd be willing to add this patch to the
FE package. File a bug against bwidget in bugzilla.redhat.com and
attach your patch.
> My hope is the change will be in upstream bwidget in the future, and if
> that would happen option 3 seems the nicest one, but if it won't happen
> i would prefer option 1. What are others (wart?) opinions about this?
Upstream bwidgets seems to be a bit slow about making new releases (the
last one was in 2003), so the best option seems to be to patch bwidget
in FE.
- --Wart
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEzk8/DeYlPfs40g8RAvDiAJ9VL7ZN/eTWr7fF1XJB3T+wbA28VgCeP9Aw
X68YZESQTcG3mrtIt1rBvnA=
=Ci6L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]