[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-07-31



buildsys fedoraproject org wrote:
gcdmaster: denis AT poolshark.org
  4: 0:1.2.1-5.fc4 (FE4)
  5: 0:1.2.1-4.fc5 (FE5)
  6: 0:1.2.1-4.fc5 (FE6)

inkscape: denis AT poolshark.org
  4: 0:0.44-3.fc4 (FE4)
  5: 0:0.44-2.fc5 (FE5)
  6: 0:0.44-2.fc6 (FE6)

so the FC-4 gtkmm issues are not all resolved yet and I will push an update asap (the last one). Still, if one expect more FC-4 updates to come, is it ok to bump the FC-5 and devel release by more than 1, say by 5, to minimize the number of unnecessary rebuilds ?

-denis


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]