Thoughts about courier-mta packaging?

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Jun 9 17:23:09 UTC 2006


On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 14:57 -0700, Chris Petersen wrote:
> 
> So this goes back to the original question below...  How flexible are
> the extras maintainers when it comes to allowing packages made from a
> really good upstream spec.  It needs a little work, which I'd be willing
> to do (and would hope that Sam would incorporate upstream), but it's not
> worth it to me to rewrite (and maintain) a new spec from scratch. 

There is nothing wrong with starting from the upstream spec.  It will
have to adhere to the standards though, no flexibility on that.  It
would be best if upstream could accept the changes you have to make so
that life is easier.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060609/5d5d5453/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list