Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08

[David Timms]

Matt Domsch wrote:
> Note: This is using the extremely reduced chroot as documented in the Extras
> Exception List.
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-4cadce5e79d38a63cad3941de1dadc9d25d67d30
> automake, autoconf, libtool and m4 had accidentally been included in
> my buildroots from previous runs; they're removed in this and
> subsequent runs, which will cause additional build failures.
> 
> Extras tree as of Thursday afternoon; it takes quite a while to
> rebuild 1800 packages on 2 architectures. :-)
> 
> In addition, about 5 packages (all perl modules IIRC) managed to hang
> in 'make test'.  I manually killed those after ~16 hours, and they'll
> show up as failed builds below.
> 
> Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE:
> gnupg2 194079 NEW
> libgpg-error 193550 NEW
> 
> Note: This is using a reduced set of packages in the build chroot as
> compared to the standard Fedora Extras build system before FC6test1.  See
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires for more
> information, including the list of packages removed from the
> default build chroot.
> 
> Extras Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 Fri Jun  9 23:06:25 CDT 2006
> Number failed to build: 206
> Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 1
> Leaving:  205
> (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package)
> 
> Of those expected to have worked...
> Without a bug filed: 198
> ----------------------------------
> abiword
> airsnort
> allegro
> amaya
> argus
> azureus
...
I am happy to spend sometime filing extras buildrequires bugs, if the 
consensus is that is what the community wants ?

DavidT.