Time to make Extras multi-lib?

[Jarod Wilson]

On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 21:41 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 10:27 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> 
> > I think the ideal way to handle this is to
> > build only 64-bit on 64-bit, 32-bit on 32-bit, but make the 32-bit
> > packages available in the 64-bit tree as well. At the moment, this isn't
> > possible,
> 
> It ain't pretty, but it's possible from the repo management POV, we
> already do copy i386 Wine packages + some dependencies over to the
> x86_64 repo as part of the signing/pushing process.  See "copydict" at
> http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/extras-buildsys/utils/extras-sign-move.py?root=fedora&rev=.&view=markup

I suppose that would do as a workaround until something more like the ne
algorithm used to determine what should be multilib in core gets
implemented for extras as well...

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jwilson at redhat.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060621/01f27951/attachment.sig>