Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-29

[Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>]

Ville Skyttä (ville skytta iki fi) said: 
> Yep, but I'm not sure about what's the best list for visibility.
> Perhaps fedora-maintainers is better than here; no docs recommend Extras
> contributors to subscribe to fedora-devel and I believe many don't read
> it (myself included).
> 
> Changing the target or adding additional ones in the script is trivial
> and I can take care of it when it's clear where the report is wanted,
> but someone who has the rights needs to auto-whitelist/subscribe the
> sender (buildsys fedoraproject org) to those lists or let me know if
> there's another sender that should be used.

How much work would it be to file bugs via XML-RPC, and track which
paths have had bugs filed for them so that we only file a bug once?

Bill