syck-python vs. python-syck?

[Ivan Gyurdiev]

>
> We have syck, perl-YAML-Parser-Syck, so a syck-python package should 
> not exist, all other python modules do have correct naming, eg. 
> python-sqlite, python-twisted, and so on...
>
> So syck-python should be moved to python-syck!!!
>
> Regarding libxml2-python; The base package is libxml2. BUT, we shoudl 
> think about renaming this to python-libxml2 and do a Provides: 
> libxml2-python.
>
> my 2 cent,
>  -of
>
> PS: Maybe also with MySQL-python, gstreamer08-python, gstreamer-python 
> and libopensync-plugin-python.
While we're at it, let's rename all mono packages to mono-<pkg>, all 
java packages to java-<pkg>, and all C packages to c-<pkg>. That way the 
user can focus on what's really important to a user (the programming 
language of the software) as opposed to irrelevant things like its brand 
name that the user can identify and recognize :)