Re: no Job ID was provided in the time required (Was: Please rebuild your packages in Fedora Extras development)

[Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>]

On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 00:02 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 18:14 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > This is a script-generated mail to remind you that some of your arch-
> > specific Fedora Extras packages were not yet rebuild for FC5. All arch-
> > specific packages in "extras/development/" that were build before 
> 
> > '2006-02-13 02:48:00 -0500' 
> > 
> > should be rebuild as soon as possible. We're running out of time, FC5 
> > is near!
> 
> I'd do, but ATM, I am facing sporadic
> ...
> Package ... enqueued.  (However, no Job ID was provided in the time
> required)
> ...
> 
> again (2 out of ca. 9 requests failed)
> 
> <rant>
> IMO, such mass rebuild requests are not of much use before we have more
> reliable buildsystem.
> </rant>

Build system seems to be doing fine ATM...  Note that with some recent
(week or two ago) changes, the "no Job ID was provided" message doesn't
necessarily indicate that the buildsys is hung.

There is a case where the code waits up to 10s to get a reply from the
builders before giving up on that attempt.  During that 10s however, you
could have just enqueued a job and be waiting for the ID to return to
you.  The plague-client code only waits 3 or 4 seconds before returning
the "no Job ID" message.

Dan