Re: no Job ID was provided in the time required (Was: Please rebuild your packages in Fedora Extras development)

[Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>]

On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 05:27 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 20:09 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 00:02 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 18:14 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > > 
> > > > This is a script-generated mail to remind you that some of your arch-
> > > > specific Fedora Extras packages were not yet rebuild for FC5. All arch-
> > > > specific packages in "extras/development/" that were build before 
> > > 
> > > > '2006-02-13 02:48:00 -0500' 
> > > > 
> > > > should be rebuild as soon as possible. We're running out of time, FC5 
> > > > is near!
> > > 
> > > I'd do, but ATM, I am facing sporadic
> > > ...
> > > Package ... enqueued.  (However, no Job ID was provided in the time
> > > required)
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > again (2 out of ca. 9 requests failed)
> > > 
> > > <rant>
> > > IMO, such mass rebuild requests are not of much use before we have more
> > > reliable buildsystem.
> > > </rant>
> > 
> > Build system seems to be doing fine ATM... 
> 
> It just happened again:
> 
> Package perl-Test-ClassAPI enqueued.  (However, no Job ID was provided
> in the time required)

Again, buildsys is doing fine.  Please check to make sure the job did
not actually get enqueued.

While I know that reporting this has been the rule for a while, the code
added a couple weeks ago should mean that 95% of the cases where this
error gets returned are not actually buildsys hangs.  It should recover
in ~10s and continue as normal.

Dan