[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 183040] Review Request: perl-Kwiki
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 183040] Review Request: perl-Kwiki
- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:09:50 -0500
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Kwiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183040
tibbs math uh edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs math uh edu 2006-03-02 10:09 EST -------
Everything looks good except the Summary. Since all of the summaries are ending
up as "blah Perl module", I guess this is a product of the specfile generator
you're using. Unfortunately I'll have to carp about all of them.
For this module something like "A Perl wiki implementation" should be fine.
As usual, the spec is clean, source matches upstream, license is correct,
package builds fine in mock (+ dependencies not yet checked in). I wonder if
you need the explicit Requires: perl(Spoon) >= 0.22; extras is guaranteed to
have that version (once you check it in) so RPM should find the requirement on
its own. No blocker, though.
Approved, subject to additional of a reasonable summary.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]