[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [games sig] Downloader for shareware data files for gpl engines such as vavoom
- From: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [games sig] Downloader for shareware data files for gpl engines such as vavoom
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 13:25:00 -0500
Hans de Goede (j w r degoede hhs nl) said:
> >>So does this allow free distributing? AFAIK Yes it does (IANAL)
> >>Is this without restrictions? Well clearly no, the following
> >>restrictions are made:
> >>-distribution must be free of charge, except normal access fees
> >>-by electronic means only
> >>-distributed only in a compressed format
> >
> >Right now we structure things so people can redistribute
> >any CDs of Core or Extras that they want, or freely *build
> >OSes on top of them*.
> >
>
> How does this stop redistribution on CD, its normal access fees only,
> electronic and still an rpm thus compressed or ... ?
Someone building an OS on top of it may not qualify for the
'normal access fees' test.
> >Anything that would require 'oh, you can't include this package
> >XXX in something you base on Fedora' isn't really feasible.
>
> This isn't really true actually there has been discussion in the past
> about allowing non-commercial (scientific) software into FE and although
> it was never allowed, it was never denied either afaik this decision
> still has to be made in the mean time it seems everyone is acting as if
> this was denied.
>
> Also in the past it has been discussed wether we actually want to cater
> CD creation again no decision was made.
Why would you want to prevent it?
Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]