syck-python vs. python-syck?

[Oliver Falk]

On 03/10/2006 07:16 AM, Jeff Pitman wrote:
> I'm a bit surprised this made it through review. If Perl gets to have 
> consistency in the naming of packages, why not Python? I know there's 
> libxml2-python, etc. But, to me that's legacy baggage.

Copy that.

We have syck, perl-YAML-Parser-Syck, so a syck-python package should not 
exist, all other python modules do have correct naming, eg. 
python-sqlite, python-twisted, and so on...

So syck-python should be moved to python-syck!!!

Regarding libxml2-python; The base package is libxml2. BUT, we shoudl 
think about renaming this to python-libxml2 and do a Provides: 
libxml2-python.

my 2 cent,
  -of

PS: Maybe also with MySQL-python, gstreamer08-python, gstreamer-python 
and libopensync-plugin-python.