[Bug 168719] Review Request: gdal

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Mar 14 14:12:36 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gdal


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168719





------- Additional Comments From silke at intevation.de  2006-03-14 09:12 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> - Drop static libs and .la files everywhere
> - Consider including pymod/samples in -python %doc

OK. I have changed this. Furthermore I have recompiled gdal fro FC 5. The new
specfile and SRPMS are available at
http://ftp.intevation.de/freegis/fedora/5

The output of rpmlint is:

W: gdal unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libgdal.so.1.9.0
W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gdal_contour
W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gdaltindex
W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gdal_translate
W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/ogr2ogr
W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/ogrtindex
W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gdaladdo
W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gdalwarp
W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/ogrinfo
W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gdalinfo

Should I strip the binaries and libraries manually or can I ignore these warnings?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list